Sunday, September 11, 2011

Creative Public Art


 How great are these? Shepparton has hit on a creative and relatively inexpensive way to create public art through the town. It becomes both a community engagement activity as well as a tourist attraction.

The cows link back to the region's dairy heritage. Some of these were done by professional artists, some were done by locals. There's a strong sense of whimsy.





This is just a small sample of the many cows around the town. They aren't all the same template - some of them have clearly been created individually from the frame out.

 I also love that they have someone who moves the cows around on a regular basis. This would hopefully mean that the display never gets 'tired', and that even the locals discover new elements to the installation all the time.

This seems like a great public art model to me.



Rockhampton in QLD has a similar display of fibreglass cattle, however there aren't as many, they aren't as gloriously painted, and they are very definitely bulls, not cows.


Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Victorian Government Reveals Wind Farm Bans

Victorian Government Reveals Wind Farm Bans:

'via Blog this'

The Victorian Government "will amend planning laws to give households power to veto wind turbines within two kilometres of their homes. Turbines will also be banned in the Macedon and McHarg ranges, in the Yarra Valley, on the Mornington and Bellarine peninsulas, and within five kilometres of the Great Ocean Road and the Bass Coast."

I am going to be interested to see the consequences of this decision for planning as a whole. The Minister seems to be saying that preservation of the landscape needs to take precedence over other planning considerations. Yet many forms of development can change views and alter people's perceptions of their environment. So the question is, does landscape impact now need to be given greater weight in the assessment process? Will it mean that anyone proposing a development has to mitigate their impact on the landscape as much as possible?

This is a big issue for planning major infrastructure such as roads and power, as they are highly visible and impossible to disguise.

It is also an issue in terms of what factors are given greater weight in planning decisions - facilities which benefit the whole community, such as power generation, or the views of a small number of individuals. Previously it has always been assumed that everyone in society has to accommodate some elements of development that they may not like, because they serve the greater good. It's almost impossible to escape something undesirable in the modern landscape, whether it's a road, a drain, a power line, a factory or whatever. But they are part and parcel of living in an industrialised society. In other words, you've got to accept the bad along with the good if you want to receive the benefits of modern technology. So why should the impact of wind energy turbines be considered any differently to the impact of any other form of infrastructure?

I wonder if it is because there is an attitude than new energy generation isn't needed, because of the power stations in the Latrobe Valley? And seriously, has any wind turbine opponent ever gone and had a look at their landscape impact?! Why is it wind energy that is so divisive?

It will be interesting to see if large scale solar power generation or geothermal power generation plants generate the same opposition as wind energy.

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

The spread of Diabetes since 2004 - Slate Labs

The spread of Diabetes since 2004 - Slate Labs

This is a fascinating look at the spread of disease. I have another map somewhere which shows access to healthy food options, and there's a direct correlation. I'll hunt it out and post it.

The map is interesting because it shows that 'lifestyle' diseases are geographically based. The next step of course is working out what it is about those areas that makes them unhealthy .. urban form? Access to fresh food? Transport infrastructure? Culture?

It would be very interesting to do a similar mapping exercise in Australia and work out if we also have geographic clusters of disease.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

How soon does a bike pay back its initial carbon footprint?  - By Brian Palmer - Slate Magazine

How soon does a bike pay back its initial carbon footprint? - By Brian Palmer - Slate Magazine
This is an interesting article on the relative carbon footprint or different types of community transport, undertaken using life-cycle assessment. One of the most interesting comments is that trains are usually much worse than almost any other form of transport, if assessed on a per passenger basis. This is because of the number of trains per day that have very few passengers. It is only the peak hour trains, jammed full, which have a good environmental performance. Part of the issue with trains is also the need for dedicated land and infrastructure, which all adds to the impact.
I wonder if this means that a flexible bus system, with different sized buses for different times of day, and using the same road-space as other vehicles, would have a better environmental performance than rail?

A Freeway for the Mornington Peninsula?


Study eyes Peninsula freeway - The AGE, 10th August 2011
It was probably inevitable that there would be rumblings in this direction once Peninsula Link was underway. Some eastern-suburbs holiday home owners must be salivating at the idea of having a freeway connection all the way down to Sorrento.
I hope this study looks at the need for connections to and between activity centres on the Pensinsula. As the population in this part of the world ages, there will be many people who are unable to drive who will become very isolated if there are no alternative means for them to get around.

ABS Spotlight : Spotlight

ABS Spotlight : Spotlight
This cracks me up - it's a great little animation to show how the Census data can be used to profile communities. I'd love to know how they put this together, someone is a very clever programmer.

Monday, June 13, 2011

NYT: The High Line Isn’t Just a Sight to See; It’s Also an Economic Dynamo

This is a really interesting comment on the impact that urban improvement has had on property values. It shows that investing in improving an urban eyesore has directly led to increased investment and increased the value of adjacent properties. This could be used as an argument for public investment in parks and gardens. It could even be used as an argument for private investment in parks and gardens!

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/06/nyregion/with-next-phase-ready-area-around-high-line-is-flourishing.html?_r=4&src=me&ref=nyregion

The Secret History of America’s Interstate Highway System » INFRASTRUCTURIST

The Secret History of America’s Interstate Highway System » INFRASTRUCTURIST

It just goes to show ... Melbourne isn't the only place where highway planning has been going on for years without the general public being aware of it.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Walkability Forum

The Promoting Liveability through Walkability Forum will be held at the Darebin Arts Centre on the 28th June 2011. See the attached link for more details.


http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102998497947-434/Walkability+Forum+Program.pdf

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Joint Built Environment and Health Promotion sector Forum concerning the Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental Design and Public Healt

Joint Built Environment and Health Promotion sector Forum concerning the Parliamentary Inquiry into Environmental Design and Public Health
Date: Friday 17 June 2010
Time: 10am – 1pm
Location:        MAV, Level 11, 60 Collins Street, Melbourne
Speakers:
•           The Hon. David Davis, Minister for Health
•           Assoc. Prof. Trevor Budge, Latrobe University
•           Assoc. Prof. Carolyn Whitzman, University of Melbourne
•           Kelly Anne Jolly, Director Cardiovascular Health, Heart Foundation
•           Assoc. Prof. John Fitzgerald, CEO, VicHealth
•           Jason Black, Project Director, PIA
Facilitator:      Ruth Davies, PIA Social Planning Chapter Chairperson
Cost: Free

The Forum will be opened by the Health Minister who will be followed by a panel of experts each presenting for 10 minutes representing a range of professionals from the planning and health fields on various issues concerning the relationship between the built environment and community good health.  The presentations will then be followed by a 1 hour workshop to assist with the development of submissions to the inquiry from the Institute, other bodies and individuals.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Effort to Restore Children’s Play Gains Momentum - The New York Times

This is an interesting article on the need to relearn how to play.  It's pretty sad if kids in America are being given instruction manuals on how to engage in creative play!

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/06/garden/06play.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=homepage

The article points out the modern dilemma of the lack of child freedom.  If children can't move around between each others homes and the local playgrounds independently, it makes it very difficult to get together and play.  This is a real loss, since playing together is one of the important ways to learn social skills.  We need to work on creating urban spaces that are both objectively and subjectively safe for children, and give them back their freedom.